[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error-last-buffer
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: next-error-last-buffer |
Date: |
13 May 2004 01:17:18 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>> (display-buffer outbuf nil t)
[...]
> This is good -- the previous behavior (which didn't do that) was very
> annoying: if you happened to have a *compilation* buffer displayed in
> another frame, starting a compilation would none-the-less insist on
> popping up another window in _this_ frame, resulting in two redundant
> windows showing the *compilation* buffer.
I should actually use 0 rather than t.
Stfean
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, (continued)
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/10
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/10
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/11
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/11
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/12
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/12
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/14
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/14
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/15
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/15
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/15
Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/24