[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dired alignment
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: dired alignment |
Date: |
Thu, 13 May 2004 11:46:01 -0400 |
Note that the problem is more general than that. If a group has a very
long name or a file is very large, alignment is lost in the output of old
GNU ls whereas it is preserved in the new.
I.e. the new alignment in GNU ls breaks alignment betwen different
invocations of `ls' but fixes alignment within a single invocation of `ls'.
And you can't have it both ways.
That's correct. What we want in Dired is the old behavior:
align ordinary lines the same way, and treat peculiar lines
specially.
- dired alignment, Karl Eichwalder, 2004/05/04
- Re: dired alignment, Andreas Schwab, 2004/05/04
- Re: dired alignment, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/05
- Re: dired alignment, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/05
- Re: dired alignment, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/06
- Re: dired alignment, Peter Whaite, 2004/05/07
- Re: dired alignment, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/08
- Re: dired alignment, Peter Whaite, 2004/05/12
- Re: dired alignment, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/12
- Re: dired alignment,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: dired alignment, Andreas Schwab, 2004/05/13
- Re: dired alignment, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/14
- Re: dired alignment, Andreas Schwab, 2004/05/14
- Re: dired alignment, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: dired alignment, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/14
- Re: dired alignment, Miles Bader, 2004/05/14
- Re: dired alignment, Edward O'Connor, 2004/05/07