[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS |
Date: |
Tue, 18 May 2004 17:00:59 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: 17 May 2004 12:22:15 -0400
>
> >> Can you compile with ENABLE_CHECKING and try again?
> >> And give me a backtrace?
>
> > Will try to do that soon.
> > By ``backtrace'' you meant a C-level backtrace inside GDB, yes?
>
> Yes.
I found the villain: dos-unsupported-char-glyph was being initialized
with a literal numerical value instead of going thru make_number.
Thanks for your support.
Btw, is pure[] usage supposed to go up when USE_LSB_TAG is in effect?
AFAICS, it went from 977KB to 1019KB with almost no changes in Lisp
files since the previous build.
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/16
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/17
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Andreas Schwab, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/19
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/20
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/18
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/18
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Michael Mauger, 2004/05/18