[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 10:54:14 -0400

    Hmmm, I was mostly just following the example of the `vector' type.  It does
    seem marginally useful to be able to create a vector-like type without
    explicitly specifying all the elements at creation-time, but perhaps for a
    special purpose type like funvecs it's not worth the extra overhead.

It is common to want a vector of variable size without specifying
a list of arguments, but I doubt that is useful for funvecs.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]