Re: ChangeLog fontifications

[Miles Bader]

On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:08:59AM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
> > Anyway (as I keep saying), I've used both extensively, and the
> > `official' format is easier to read.
> 
> could it be easier to read precisely because Emacs supports it better?

Probably not.

-Miles
-- 
P.S.  All information contained in the above letter is false,
      for reasons of military security.