Re: file-remote-p

[Stefan Monnier]

> I tend to prefer alternative 2. An implementation of file-remote-p in
> Tramp (and maybe other packages I don't know) would be simple.
[...]
> What do people think about?

I obviously completely agree since I pointed out something similar back when
file-remote-p was introduced (although I probably wasn't as clear as you
were: I just intuited that it wouldn't be flexible enough, although I was
thinking of cases like url-handler-mode where file:///foo/bar should be
considered local).


        Stefan