Re: convert-standard-filename's doc

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 20:26:12 +0200
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> 
> Doing what you suggest means a longish docstring with much non-useful
> info (non-useful for each system's users, I mean), and fixing all
> versions of the docstring each time one of the functions is changed or a
> new system added.

We could have a short version in the doc string and a longer one in
the manual.

In any case, I think Kai is right saying that the doc string should
give more emphasis to the fact that the function makes the file name
a valid one for the underlying platform.