Re: improving query-replace and query-replace-regexp

[Werner LEMBERG]

> > I just wonder why I still have to type `RET'.  A query-replace
> > action doesn't happen immediately; you still have to press `y',
> > `n', etc.  Thus I suggest, if possible, to omit the `RET'.
> 
> Surely you don't repeat query-replace commands so often that `M-%
> RET' is significantly harder to type than `M-% M-%'?

Aah, a misunderstanding!  I thought that I have to type `M-% M-% RET'.
Of course `M-% RET' is fine.  Actually, `M-% M-%' and `M-% RET' could
do the same...


    Werner