Re: Possible UTF-8 CJK Regressions in Terminal Emulators

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:27:36PM +0900, Kenichi Handa
> wrote:
>>  I think it's a big improvement especially for CJK users,
>> and is an improvement of an existing feature rather than
>> a new feature.  If people agree on making
>> utf-translate-cjk-mode to t, I'll brush-up the current
>> working code and install the changes.

> Absolutely!  Then we can say "utf-8 is (almost) completely
> supported"...  I think this is a very important thing.

I think "completely" is still too strong even with preceding
"(almost)".  Perhaps "utf-8 support is fairly good" or
"Unicode BMP support is fairly good".

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden