Re: display word wrapping

[Juanma Barranquero]

On 08 Jun 2004 11:33:55 +0200
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) wrote:

> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> > Since image-types has been the only documented way of accessing that
> > information so far, I think there is some justification in not
> > changing its meaning before any package provider has had a chance to
> > adapt.
> 
> True.

What would that mean?

(make-obsolete-variable 'image-types
                        "use function `image-type-available-p'."
                        "22.1 (hopefully)")

Eh, perhaps we need a make-obsolete-future ;-)

But seriously, we're doing a feature-packed release, and we're talking
about a tiny change that will affect two or three packages out there in
very minor (and easily fixable, I think) ways.  Prereleases will take
months and months (based on previous experience)...

David, do you *really* feel it is a big problem? (You're the author of
one of these packages, after all, and I'm not.)

                                                                Juanma