[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug tracking

From: Kim F. Storm
Subject: Re: Bug tracking
Date: 15 Jun 2004 10:11:17 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 01:09:38AM +0200, Kim F. Storm wrote:
> > We could start small and simple:
> > 
> > Create an emacs/tracker subdirectory and create text files 1.bug, 2.bug, 
> > etc.
> > with one file for each bug.
> > 
> > Then add a simple header to the file, initially just:
> Please look at the link I posted earlier about Andrew Suffield's bug system
> which covers many of these issues (it's an email-based system).  I don't know
> that we could use his system unchanged, but it might be nice to have at least
> a bit of consistency of format or something.

Sure, but I don't want to go ahead an implement this before
we get some sort of consensus on the topic.

So the question is:

Would the proposed "trackers in cvs" + "emacs frontent" (with no email
interface) be sufficient for you and others who have voiced a strong
rejection of web based trackers?

Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]