[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ECB
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: ECB |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:59:56 -0400 |
> I thought (from other posts) that ECB essentially _contained_ speedbar,
> though probably an updated version -- so it seems like there would be
> little pain in moving to ECB from that perspective.
It can contain (physically on the screen, not as part of the Lisp
package) speedbar, but that is an option. It also uses speedbar
functionality to support modes that are not supported by semantic.
So, does this mean that ECB makes the existing Speebar package
obsolete?
If not, then why not?
- ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/02
- Re: ECB, Jason Rumney, 2004/07/02
- Re: ECB, Jérôme Marant, 2004/07/02
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/03
- Re: ECB, Jason Rumney, 2004/07/03
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/05
- Re: ECB, Miles Bader, 2004/07/05
- Re: ECB, Jason Rumney, 2004/07/06
- Re: ECB,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: ECB, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/07/03
- Re: ECB, Stefan, 2004/07/03
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/03
- Re: ECB, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/07/04
- Re: ECB, Jason Rumney, 2004/07/04
- Re: ECB, Jens Lautenbacher, 2004/07/04
- Re: ECB, Eric M. Ludlam, 2004/07/05
- Re: ECB, Stefan, 2004/07/05
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/12
- Re[2]: ECB, Eric M. Ludlam, 2004/07/12