Re: loaddefs.el and MH-E

[Bill Wohler]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:

> > Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 11:41:26 -0700
> > From: Bill Wohler <address@hidden>
> > 
> > The loaddefs.el definitions are the entry points into MH-E and these
> > (few) definitions should be the only ones from MH-E loaded initially.
> > Once MH-E is loaded, the definitions in mh-loaddefs.el are loaded for
> > the support functions. The only trouble that it would cause to load the
> > mh-loaddefs.el prematurely is to make it difficult for the new user to
> > decide which of the hundreds of functions to choose.
> 
> Sorry, for some reason it seemed to me that I saw the autoloads for
> the same symbols in both of the files.

That would not be intentional, but as long as the entry points weren't
missing from loaddefs.el, I don't think it would do any harm to have
duplicates in mh-loaddefs.el, would it?

-- 
Bill Wohler <address@hidden>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.