[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch) |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 07:19:06 -0400 |
For lispref this way of organizing things may be reasonable, but for
man it makes no sense. It might be nice to have things like
man/cl.texi updated, but such things are a luxury right now. What we
worry about now is the Emacs and Elisp manual and info.texi.
I agree. Could you remove the other files from the `man' list, keeping
only info.texi and those that are part of the Emacs manual?
Also, remove gfdl.texi and gpl.texi if they are included.
I proofread all of the Elisp manual except the chapters (if you do
`C-h i elisp'):
Advising Functions
Debugging
Customization
Modes
Text
Processes
Display
Calendar
Nearly all the work that has been done, has been done by you,
and you are doing a very good job of it.
I am pretty sure there has been little change in the advice system.
If you could read the others of those sections, it would be very
useful.
I did also not check or update:
Antinews
GNU Free Documentation License
GPL
Standard Buffer-Local Variables
Standard Keymaps
Standard Hooks
New Symbols
The file lispref/anti.texi is for the Emacs 20 to 21 transition.
This file needs to be rewritten from zero, based on what's in
etc/NEWS since 21.1.
There is no need to review the GFDL and GPL sections.
Checking those four appendixes only needs to be done once,
if someone can do them in a careful way.
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, (continued)
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/09/10
- Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/11
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Luc Teirlinck, 2004/09/14
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Luc Teirlinck, 2004/09/18
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Richard Stallman, 2004/09/19
- Re: Proof-reading manuals, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/19
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Stefan, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/13
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2004/09/15
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Robert J. Chassell, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/13