[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: byte-code optimizations

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: byte-code optimizations
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:00:35 -0400

    Better yet: you also get the exact same result code (without any lapcode
    optimization) if you use

       (defsubst* cddr (x) (cdr (cdr x)))

    I.e. using the `defubst*' (from CL).

What aspect of that definition leads to better results?
Can we change the standard defsubst in a simple way
to achieve the same thing?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]