|
| From: | Richard Stallman |
| Subject: | Re: byte-code optimizations |
| Date: | Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:00:35 -0400 |
Better yet: you also get the exact same result code (without any lapcode
optimization) if you use
(defsubst* cddr (x) (cdr (cdr x)))
I.e. using the `defubst*' (from CL).
What aspect of that definition leads to better results?
Can we change the standard defsubst in a simple way
to achieve the same thing?
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |