Re: yet more term.el fixes #2

[Miles Bader]

Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
> One remaining problem in term.el is the handling of characters in the
> 128-255 range (and probably the non 8-bit encodings too).  term.el
> uses move-to-column to position the cursor at certain positions in the
> buffer. But the char-width of a character >127 is 4 (at least in my
> setup), this confuses the cursor positioning

Seems odd... in *scratch* in an `emacs -q' session:

   (char-width ?\217)
   1
   (char-width ?á)
   1
   (char-width ?字)
   2

Does term.el use some funny buffer settings?

-Miles
-- 
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
has to be us.  -- Jerry Garcia