[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: backup method
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: backup method |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:19:08 +0900 |
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:25:45 +0100, Reiner Steib
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27 2005, Kevin Rodgers wrote:
> > Which is why backup-by-copying-when-linked should be t by default.
>
> ACK. I never understood why it is nil by default. Is there a strong
> reason for the current default?
See my reply to Kevin.
Basically it depends on what the hard-link is being used for as to
whether you want it to be broken on save or not. One could argue that
the "native" unix behavior is to not break the link (since that's
e.g., what "cat > file" does), but a lot of people have become
accustomed to using emacs' link breaking to make a sort of cheap COW
(copy-on-write) facility for hard-linked trees; other
developer-oriented utilities, most notably the "patch" command, have
the same behavior (breaking the link).
In any case, I think it's far too late to change the default.
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- Re: backup method, (continued)
- Re: backup method, Richard Stallman, 2005/01/30
- Re: backup method, Han Boetes, 2005/01/30
- Re: backup method, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/01/29
- Re: backup method, Richard Stallman, 2005/01/30
- Re: backup method, Han Boetes, 2005/01/30
Re: backup method, Kevin Rodgers, 2005/01/27
Re: backup method, Miles Bader, 2005/01/27
Re: backup method, Richard Stallman, 2005/01/27
Re: backup method, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/01/26
Re: backup method, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/01/27