[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:12:59 -0500 |
However, a variant which might be even clearer, and maybe less
objectionable would be
How about "FOO is an obsolete function (now and since 21.4)".
Or "FOO is an obsolete function (marked obsolete in Emacs 21.4)".
- Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el, (continued)
- Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el, Bill Wohler, 2005/03/08
- Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el, Andreas Schwab, 2005/03/08
- Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el, Nick Roberts, 2005/03/08
- Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el, Miles Bader, 2005/03/08
- Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el, Bill Wohler, 2005/03/08
- Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/09
- Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el, David Kastrup, 2005/03/09
- Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el, Miles Bader, 2005/03/09
- Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/08
- Re: English usage bug in bytecomp.el, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/08