[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs -Q not documented
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: emacs -Q not documented |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:27:09 +0900 |
On Apr 5, 2005 7:04 PM, Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> wrote:
> > There seems no reason not to split it into a couple of more coherent
> > options though.
>
> So instead of "emacs -Q" I have to ask a user to please try
> "emacs -q -A -T --no-bla-bla -V --no-blinking-cursor"
That's a strawman.
I meant something like:
emacs -Q -N
where -Q means "no init files or site-init files"
and -N means turn off all frame features
I think typing a few extra letters in such rare cases is hardly going
to cause much hardship, and the improvement in clarity makes it
worthwhile.
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
Re: emacs -Q not documented, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/04
Re: emacs -Q not documented, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/04/05
Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/05
Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/05
Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/05
Re: emacs -Q not documented, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/05
Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/06