[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Incompatible change without "warning"
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Incompatible change without "warning" |
Date: |
Sun, 01 May 2005 14:57:10 -0400 |
DEFVAR_LISP ("executing-macro", &Vexecuting_macro,
doc: /* Currently executing keyboard macro (string or
vector); nil if none executing. */);
DEFVAR_INT ("executing-macro-index", &executing_macro_index,
doc: /* Index in currently executing keyboard macro;
undefined if none executing. */);
DEFVAR_LISP_NOPRO ("executing-kbd-macro", &Vexecuting_macro,
doc: /* Currently executing keyboard macro (string or
vector); nil if none executing. */);
I will change that one.
Note that if you remove executing-macro you need to change the elisp manual:
* The state of keyboard macro execution is saved and restored. While
Edebug is active, `executing-macro' is bound to
`edebug-continue-kbd-macro'.
That isn't true anyway, so it is a good thing you pointed me at it.
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", (continued)
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/05/01
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/05/01
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/05/02
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", David Kastrup, 2005/05/02
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/05/02
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/03
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", David Kastrup, 2005/05/03
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/05/04
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/05/03
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/05/02
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning",
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/01
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/05/01