Re: Filling woes

[David Kastrup]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> I agree it would be better to try adaptive-fill-function first.  If
> it returns nil, the code should proceed to try the appropriate
> regexp.

This is a very incompatible change, since adaptive-fill-function's
return value previously carried no meaning.

While the current scheme appears braindead, we could make it somewhat
saner in a compatible way by allowing adaptive-fill-regexp to be nil,
in which case adaptive-fill-function would get called unconditionally.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum