Re: Change to process.c

[David Hunter]

Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > This was a misplaced volatile.  It's not needed here in the first place,
> > so I removed it.
>
> Looking closer, the volatile _is_ needed.  But it needs to be placed at
> the right side of the asterisk.

Oops.. oh yeah.  I want a volatile pointer to a function that returns a 
pointer; not a pointer to a function that returns a volatile pointer.

Sorry for not weighing in during the discussion, but thanks for catching and 
fixing this.

(I can't find my C book!!)
-Dave