Re: non-break-space in tutorial

[Kim F. Storm]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> Here is a generic approach (similar to using a display table,
>> but without the overhead):
>
> What overhead?  Just for the record, could all you people check the value of
> `standard-display-table' in your current Emacs session?  My bet is that most
> of you have it non-nil already.

It is non-nil here, indeed, but...

the whole mess with the C-level escape glyph support code was because RMS
rejected the original approach that used the display table...

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk