[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grep.el regexp
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: grep.el regexp |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 00:03:06 -0400 |
> I am not sure whether that relates to the suggestion I made:
>> I think that if we wrote a separate regexp for each kind of grep,
>> all together they would match a lot fewer different strings than the
>> current regexp does, and they would be much easier to understand.
Indeed, the two do not conflict. I.e. I think there's no problem with
compile.el's current behavior in this regard and I believe your suggestion
w.r.t grep.el should work just fine.
Would someone like to try implementing this?
(Please respond to this message, if so.)
- Re: grep.el regexp,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: grep.el regexp, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/09
- Re: grep.el regexp, Juri Linkov, 2005/07/09
- Re: grep.el regexp, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/10
- Re: grep.el regexp, Juri Linkov, 2005/07/11
- Re: grep.el regexp, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/11
- Re: grep.el regexp, Juri Linkov, 2005/07/19
- Re: grep.el regexp, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/22
- Re: grep.el regexp, Juri Linkov, 2005/07/22
- Re: grep.el regexp, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/23
- Re: grep.el regexp, Juri Linkov, 2005/07/19