[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *"

From: Juanma Barranquero
Subject: Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *"
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:29:30 +0200

On 7/28/05, Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:

> It seems completely pointless to have an obfuscating macro (ok it's
> actually a typedef) like FRAME_PTR.

And other structs (like window, buffer, etc.) are used directly.

> I'd say, get rid of it.

Fine by me.

Any objections, anyone?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]