Re: FOR-RELEASE.W32

[Jason Rumney]

Lennart Borgman wrote:

> I still think FOR-RELEASE.W32 is a good and simple name. However if we 
> think that is to strong and TODO is too weak then we could try 
> something else, but let it be visible! That shows we care and that 
> attracts users.

I think creating a separate file for W32 TODO or FOR-RELEASE items would 
encourage developers who are interested in w32 to only work on those 
issues, which is a bad thing.

It is better to put all W32 issues in TODO, or if they are important for 
release, in FOR-RELEASE, then if only W32 issues are left in 
FOR-RELEASE, RMS can make the decision to move these issues into TODO to 
avoid delaying a release.