[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Yet another emacs icons
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Yet another emacs icons |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 09:04:55 +0900 |
I think all of your icons are very pretty, but I liked the earlier
"notebook" versions much better -- it seems like a notebook conveys
the generic idea of editor, and the E/horns add an easily recognizable
"tag" to tell you it's Emacs[*]. I think adding the word "emacs" to
the icon is pretty useless except at huge icon sizes, and merely
muddles up the icon at small sizes.
So my requests: Add back the "notebook". Get rid of the word "Emacs"
in small sizes (anything less than 64x64 really).
However _any_ of these new icons is better than the old Gnu/mushroom
icon -- now I see that old icon at about 16x16 size in my taskbar, and
it looks basically like a piece of lint! The original image is far
too detailed to ever be very useful as an icon i think.
[*] Of course someone who doesn't use emacs won't know what the
crooked horns mean -- but so what? Icons are not really any good at
introducing new concept anyway. They are much more useful for
_recognition_ than documentation.
-miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
Re: Yet another emacs icons, Lennart Borgman, 2005/10/10
- Re: Yet another emacs icons, Andrew Zhilin, 2005/10/15
- Re: Yet another emacs icons,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Yet another emacs icons, Lennart Borgman, 2005/10/15
- RE: Yet another emacs icons, Drew Adams, 2005/10/15
- Re: Yet another emacs icons, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/16
- RE: Yet another emacs icons, Drew Adams, 2005/10/16
- Re: Yet another emacs icons, Miles Bader, 2005/10/16
- Re: Yet another emacs icons, Ken Manheimer, 2005/10/17
- Re: Yet another emacs icons, Lennart Borgman, 2005/10/17
- Re: Yet another emacs icons, Ken Manheimer, 2005/10/17
Re: Yet another emacs icons, Andrew Zhilin, 2005/10/17