Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc

[Kevin Greiner]

Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:

> [Cc'ed to address@hidden
>> I agree, that the correspondence is quite use full, but I also do
>> agree with Juri, that the slightly different behavior of M-# is
>> extremely inconvenient.  IMO this should be fixed, by making M-#
>> advance to (like M-u does!).
>
> Actually, this is a bug in the the development version of Gnus
> (but not in the Gnus version in Emacs CVS).  It also causes
> gnus-uu-unmark-thread to fail to unmark the whole thread.
>
> That's because gnus-summary-remove-process-mark doesn't return t
> anymore.  The last expression of both gnus-summary-set-process-mark
> and gnus-summary-remove-process-mark is the call to
> gnus-summary-update-secondary-mark which explicitly returns t.
> But in gnus-summary-remove-process-mark this t gets lost due
> to dolist which returns nil.  I think the right fix is to add
> the return value t as the last expression in
> gnus-summary-remove-process-mark.
>
> Could someone with CVS access to the Gnus repository on gnus.org
> fix this?

Done.

Kevin