[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:41:21 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I can see why you might hesitate to _read_ a list with a lot of spam,
> but why, rationally, would the amount of spam affect your decision to
> post to the list? I don't see how it makes any difference.
It makes no difference indeed in the case where you don't read the list *at
all* before posting. But if you select the newsgroup just before posting an
article (the standard operation AFAIK: it's even usually recommended to
read a bit of a newsgroup before you post to it), or if you check the
archive before sending a mail to the mailing-list, then I'd be surprised if
the spam doesn't turn you off. I mean: you really have to look for the
valid articles in order to realize that the group/list is actually
still alive.
Stefan
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden, Alan Mackenzie, 2005/12/12
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden, Xavier Maillard, 2005/12/12
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden, Ken Raeburn, 2005/12/13
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden, Alan Mackenzie, 2005/12/13
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden, Sam Steingold, 2005/12/12
Re: Let's shut down address@hidden,
Stefan Monnier <=