[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always correct) |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:43:09 +0200 |
> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:39:25 -0800
>
> Sorry, I don't know how to fix that in Outlook. I use Outlook 2000, for
> various reasons related to work. It's old, but still a very common (the most
> common?) email client in use. I don't defend it, but it's the one I use.
Perhaps you could try Emacs, if only for posting to Emacs-related
forums.
> If it produces brain-dead subject lines, but it is a very common mailer,
> maybe Rmail's C-c C-n could somehow deal with it by adding extra
> intelligence to handle the retarded output ;-)?
I thought about that, but eventually rejected the idea: it could cause
too many errors due to wrong matches.
> I don't even know what C-c C-n does
It finds the next message with the same subject.
> On a related subject: Unlike the posts to emacs-devel, bug reports get the
> original sender's email address (e.g. "address@hidden") prepended
> to the subject line
That's how Emacs formats forwarded messages.
- RE: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], (continued)
- RE: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Drew Adams, 2005/12/14
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Kevin Rodgers, 2005/12/14
- RE: address@hidden: links in Help bufferaren'talwayscorrect], Drew Adams, 2005/12/14
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Stefan Monnier, 2005/12/14
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/15
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/14
- bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always correct), Drew Adams, 2005/12/15
- Re: bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always correct), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/12/15
- Re: bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always correct), Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/16
- Re: bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always correct), Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/16
- Re: bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always correct),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/15
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Kevin Rodgers, 2005/12/16