[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Emacs antialiasing in X

From: Jan Djärv
Subject: Re: Emacs antialiasing in X
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:31:48 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923)

Emfox Zhou wrote:
David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:

in emacs-unicode-2, do I want to keep the latter, since the
character representation is changing?

Also, would it be better to come up with a patch against
emacs-unicode-2 that adds XFT support, or vice-versa?  I am inclined
towards the former.

I think emacs-unicode-2 is more recent, and a patch against emacs-unicode-2
to add XFT support is better. as a notice, I have tested both of the branches,
and find the XFT branch could not deal properly with chinese, while the unicode
one seems ok for everything.

I agree, you would start with emacs-unicode-2 and then add XFT to that, i.e. the former as you state above. W.r.t. characters, this implies that you shall keep whatever is in the emacs-unicode-2 branch.

        Jan D.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]