[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs antialiasing in X
From: |
David Abrahams |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs antialiasing in X |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:17:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Jan D." <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> Are you keeping a tag on the trunk for the last revision you've merged
>> into your branch? If so,
>>
>> cvs up -jLastMergeTag -jHEAD
>>
>> should get you an incremental merge with no bogus conflicts. And then
>> I could use your LastMergeTag to merge with emacs-unicode-2 with fewer
>> conflicts as well.
>
> No tag, but you can use the date specifier, the cvs log message gives
> the date.
Thanks, I'll do that. FWIW, if you do use such tags you can
substantially reduce the number of conflicts you see upon merging.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, (continued)
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Miles Bader, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X,
David Abrahams <=
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Miles Bader, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Miles Bader, 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/19
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/28
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Emfox Zhou, 2006/01/16