[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Risky local variable mechanism
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Risky local variable mechanism |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:15:24 -0600 (CST) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
I think if something is not safe enough for root, it should also be
considered unsafe for random users. So I don't see any need to make
a distinction.
OK, so maybe not.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, (continued)
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/10
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/10
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/10
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/10
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/11
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/11
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/10
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/11
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/11
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/14
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/13