[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rcirc changes
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: rcirc changes |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:56:13 +0900 |
On 2/17/06, Ryan Yeske <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm not sure I totally understand. But what I mean by breaking
> completion is that I may see something like:
>
> <miles> hello
>
> when really your nick is snogglethorpe; I have just aliased it to
> miles. If I then cycle through nicks to reply to you, I find that
> miles isn't in the list.
I obviously use rcirc diffently than you (maybe because I'm using it
with bitlbee) -- I have a separate buffer for each conversation, so I
never type anything like "NICK: ..." -- I just type "...". So I never
use any sort of completion. In this context, I just don't care about
anything except the appearance, and the simple code I added works
great.
For completion to work properly, presumably it would have to add the
abbrevs to the completion set and do the reverse mapping at some
point; is this something fundamentally hard, or is it just a matter of
coding?
> What about not showing your own nick at all? Just a copy of the
> prompt and the text you submitted as it is?
Well I rather _want_ to show at least some short indicator for myself,
as it makes logs easier to read (anyway, how would you do that?).
Thanks,
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- rcirc changes, Miles Bader, 2006/02/09
- Re: rcirc changes, Ryan Yeske, 2006/02/11
- Re: rcirc changes, Ryan Yeske, 2006/02/15
- Re: rcirc changes, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/15
- Re: rcirc changes, Miles Bader, 2006/02/16
- Re: rcirc changes, Ryan Yeske, 2006/02/16
- Re: rcirc changes,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: rcirc changes, Björn Lindström, 2006/02/17
- Re: rcirc changes, Miles Bader, 2006/02/18
- Re: rcirc changes, David Kastrup, 2006/02/18
- Re: rcirc changes, Miles Bader, 2006/02/18
- Re: rcirc changes, Alex Schroeder, 2006/02/18