Re: cl-byte-compile-compiler-macro

[Glenn Morris]

Richard Stallman wrote:

> Right.  So compiling a call to that macro will crash unless cl is
> loaded.

When I explicitly (require 'cl), there is no error.

> I think we should move compiler-macroexpand and
> cl-byte-compile-compiler-macro from cl-macs.el into subr.el.  It looks
> like that will make the compilation of these macro calls work properly,
> and it is rather painless.

I tried that. I got a new Compile-Log error, this time about
cl-defsubst-expand. So I moved that too. Then I got an error about
cl-simple-exprs-p. Then I gave up. :)