[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem report #8
|
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
|
Subject: |
Re: Problem report #8 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:36:20 +0900 |
|
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
> I signed up to see the Coverity problem reports.
> RMS asked me to post a few here.
> There are 76 problems, I analyzed 10 of them, none of them were bugs
> in emacs.
> Hopefully more people can help with this.
> If you analyze the problem, please add to the subject the resolution
> which can be one of the following:
> Status:
> UNINSPECTED
> BUG
> FALSE
> RESOLVED
> IGNORE
> PENDING
Could you please explain which of the above to select in
which situation. For instance, I think FALSE and RESOLVED
are:
FALSE -- the report was false alarm.
RESOLVED -- the report correctly found a bug and it is fixed.
But, I'm not sure about the others.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden