[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mem leak
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: mem leak |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:44:37 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> Overflow can happen because the .elc file is missing, and the
> not-completely-functional Emacs that results is quite functional enough to
> then byte-compile the file, so it makes bootstrapping easier.
Hmmm, how hard would it be to have it runnable, but not _installable_ in
such a case (for instance, if it retained the executable, but gave it
another name, "emacs-non-pure" or something)?
[I don't know whether it's easy to get the results of the failure in a
form that make can easily use...]
-Miles
--
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
has to be us. -- Jerry Garcia
- mem leak, Miles Bader, 2006/04/23
- Re: mem leak, LENNART BORGMAN, 2006/04/24
- Re: mem leak, Miles Bader, 2006/04/24
- Re: mem leak, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/24
- memory consumption with pure-space-overflow (was: mem leak), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/26
- Re: memory consumption with pure-space-overflow (was: mem leak), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/27
- Re: memory consumption with pure-space-overflow, Reiner Steib, 2006/04/27
- Re: memory consumption with pure-space-overflow, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/27