[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: PURESIZE increased (again) |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:52:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> Do you have some local changes on your system, or is this a plain
> "make bootstrap" of the CVS checkout, with all the defaults wrt
> compiler switches, libraries, etc.? (Not that I see how local changes
> to anything but the Lisp files themselves could produce such bloat.)
>
> Does anyone have ideas as to what could cause such a significant
> difference in pure storage use on two identical architectures?
>
> I'm stumped.
Different data types (UNION_something or what it was?)? Different
alignment?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), (continued)
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/16
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/20
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/20
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/20
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/20
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/21
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/21
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/21
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/26
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again),
David Kastrup <=
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Ken Raeburn, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Ken Raeburn, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Andreas Schwab, 2006/04/28