Re: [PATCH]: improving the MIK encoding in GNU emacs

[Anton Zinoviev]

I'm sorry fo the delayed report - I was on vacation.

On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:51:22AM +0900, Kenichi Handa wrote:
> 
> > I believe Anton would agree with the new definition of MIK as it was him
> > that revealed the sources that led to the redefinition of MIK.
> 
> Thank you.  I'll commit it if Anton doesn't oppose it.

Please go ahead.  The problem with MIK and the other DOS "codepages"
is that some of the codes in the codepages correspond to several
Unicode symbols.  The choice of Microsoft for these symbols is not the
best but it is better to stick with it in order have everywhere only
one definition of MIK.

> By the way, don't we have to update the URL shown in the
> comment?
> 
> ;; Suggested by Anton Zinoviev <address@hidden>: Bulgarian DOS
> ;; codepage.  Table at
> ;; <URL:http://czyborra.com/charsets/bulgarian-mik.txt.gz>.

Yes this no longer will be true.  You can refer to the following
"source":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIK_Code_page

Anton Zinoviev