[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces |
Date: |
Mon, 22 May 2006 21:45:42 +0300 |
> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 06:49:18 -0700
>
> If this gets fixed (optimized), then the performance might be usable and I
> might stick with this design - it has a few advantages. Any chance someone
> will look at this problem (considered as a bug) before the release?
Not without you posting some minimal code that creates this slowdown.
- Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/21
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/22
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/22
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/22
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/22
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/05/22
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/22
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/22
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/22
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/25
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/23