[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: delete-process bug
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: delete-process bug |
Date: |
Tue, 30 May 2006 01:11:51 +0300 |
> From: address@hidden (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac)
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 23:42:39 +0200
>
> I will summarize the whole thing:
Thanks. I think I understand now.
> AFAICT, both functions are just in a #ifdef subprocesses. But, maybe,
> in some systems, sigchld_handler is not used albeit compiled.
>
> The question I asked is : do we have to disable the
> `deleted_process_alist' mechanism in some configuration to avoid that
> it will be filled but never cleaned ?
Well, as we established, at least on MS-Windows, sigchld_handler _is_
called, so your fix should work for the Windows build, AFAIU.
- Re: delete-process bug, (continued)
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/30
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/30
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/30
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/30
- Re: delete-process bug, Agustin Martin, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug (was: Ispell loads dict twice.), Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/25