[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: yow.c
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: yow.c |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:03:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:
>>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Richard> How many lines can someone add before papers would need
> Richard> to be signed? We can surely accept 5 from any person.
>
> here's my second contribution...
>
> If it weren't for LAWYERS, we wouldn't NEED THEM!
I have to agree with Miles. The proposals I have seen so far are
quite substandard. I don't consider it likely we could manage to come
up with a process that would yield a significant quota of worthwhile
contributions without causing people to get miffed in the process.
While I thought producing substitute Zippyisms a good idea at first,
it does not seem like it could be done just like that.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: yow.c, (continued)
- Re: yow.c, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/06/13
- Re: yow.c, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/14
- Re: yow.c, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/13
- Re: yow.c, Jay Belanger, 2006/06/14
- Re: yow.c, Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/06/15
- Re: yow.c, Jay Belanger, 2006/06/16
- Re: yow.c, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/17
- Re: yow.c, Jay Belanger, 2006/06/19
- Re: yow.c, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/19
- Re: yow.c, Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/06/20
- Re: yow.c,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: yow.c, Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/06/20
- Re: yow.c, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/17