[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: locals.texi
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: locals.texi |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:33:01 +1200 |
Richard Stallman writes:
> > 1. It is always cleaner to use separate calls to make-local-variable
> > and setq.
>
> That's not true. *You* may always find it cleaner, but it's far from
> a general truth.
>
> I think that separate calls are always cleaner.
> You're entitled to your opinion, of course.
I guess if the make-local-variable and setq get separated then it might
not be immediately obvious that the variable is buffer-local.
However, my original question was that with a variable like
font-lock-defaults, that automatically becomes buffer-local in each buffer, I
presumably don't need to use make-local-variable at all?
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob