[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: safe_call1 considered harmful

From: Kenichi Handa
Subject: Re: safe_call1 considered harmful
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:44:10 +0900
User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     But, by considering this problem again, I found another
>     solution than calling find-operation-coding-system with
>     (FILENAME . BUFFER).  That is to provide an extra argument
>     BUFFER.

> Would you please be more concrete?  Passing an extra argument to a set
> of functions is very incompatible.

find-operation-coding-system calls a registered function
with a single argument; a list of arguments given to
find-operation-coding-system.  So, appending an extra
argument at the tail of the list is fairly safe.

Kenichi Handa

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]