[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PCL-CVS: "Can not run two cvs processes simultaneously"
From: |
Stuart D. Herring |
Subject: |
Re: PCL-CVS: "Can not run two cvs processes simultaneously" |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:32:19 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.6-7.el3.7lanl |
> (defvar cvs-temp-buffer-name
> ! ;; If uniquification is done `forward' the buffer becomes non-hidden,
> ! ;; so force a hidden buffer in that case. Note that having a unique
> ! ;; name here prevents concurrent runs of CVS, even in different *cvs*
> ! ;; buffers!
> ! '(if (and (boundp 'uniquify-buffer-name-style)
> ! (eq uniquify-buffer-name-style 'forward))
> ! " *cvs-tmp*"
> ! (expand-file-name " *cvs-tmp*" dir))
> "*Name of the cvs temporary buffer.
> Output from cvs is placed here for asynchronous commands.")
I haven't been following this thread closely, but there has to be a better
way than to just say that forward uniquification loses. Isn't there a
mechanism to disable uniquification for some buffer? I see
`uniquify-ignore-buffers-re' at least; perhaps there should also be a way
to disable it via a local variable or so?
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.