[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: why "in_sighandler"?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: why "in_sighandler"? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:13:09 -0400 |
handling_signal may be non-zero even if no signal handler is invoked.
For example, from UNBLOCK_INPUT (via reinvoke_input_signal =>
handle_async_input). Also if SYNC_INPUT is used. So handling_signal
really means "handling X11/GUI event". I needed a variable that was
only set when the signal handler is running.
Could you please install comments which clearly explain this?
- Re: why "in_sighandler"?, (continued)
- Re: why "in_sighandler"?, Jan Djärv, 2006/08/21
- Re: why "in_sighandler"?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/08/21
- Re: why "in_sighandler"?, Jan Djärv, 2006/08/21
- Re: why "in_sighandler"?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/08/21
- Re: why "in_sighandler"?, Jan Djärv, 2006/08/22
- Re: why "in_sighandler"?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/08/22
- Re: why "in_sighandler"?, Jan Djärv, 2006/08/22
- Re: why "in_sighandler"?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/08/22
- Re: why "in_sighandler"?, Jan Djärv, 2006/08/22
- Re: why "in_sighandler"?, Andreas Schwab, 2006/08/22
Re: why "in_sighandler"?,
Richard Stallman <=