[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Percent sign in message
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Percent sign in message |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:27:44 -0400 |
> I think that would give too many false warnings, because it is not
> unusual to obtain the format string from some non-constant source.
Could be. But the warning can be turned off by using (message "%s" <exp>).
Hmm. If the warning is given only in the case of one arg, maybe it won't
get too many spurious hits. I was thinking of getting nontrivial format
strings from nonconstant sources; but those cases would usually have
further arguments.
But let's save this for later.
- Re: Percent sign in message, (continued)
- Re: Percent sign in message, Whitfield Diffie, 2006/09/11
- Re: Percent sign in message, David Kastrup, 2006/09/11
- Re: Percent sign in message, Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/11
- Re: Percent sign in message, Stefan Monnier, 2006/09/11
- Re: Percent sign in message, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/11
- Re: Percent sign in message, Stefan Monnier, 2006/09/11
- Re: Percent sign in message, David Kastrup, 2006/09/11
- Re: Percent sign in message, Stefan Monnier, 2006/09/11
- Re: Percent sign in message, David Kastrup, 2006/09/11
- Re: Percent sign in message, Stefan Monnier, 2006/09/11
- Re: Percent sign in message,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Percent sign in message, David Kastrup, 2006/09/12
- Re: Percent sign in message, Stuart D. Herring, 2006/09/19
- Re: Percent sign in message, David Kastrup, 2006/09/19