[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug Database?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Bug Database? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:26:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Frank Schmitt <address@hidden> writes:
> Nick Roberts <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> > As a point of reference GDB has 1218 open bugs in its
>> > database and still gets released roughly on a six monthly
>> > cycle.
>> >
>> > I suspect it means there is insufficient priority to fixing GDB bugs.
>>
>> It depends how you measure things. They have more people using a
>> recent version of GDB and more people fixing bugs. There's a clear
>> message: if you want it fixed for the next version then you may
>> have to fix it yourself.
>
> Which results in the fact that gdb is since years completely unusable
> for C++ programs relying on templated functions (so basically all C++
> programs which aren't just pimped C).
One could argue that C++ was more in need of fixing than GDB...
Unfortunately, C++ got standardized before we could standardize GDB.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Re: Bug Database?, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/18
- Re: Bug Database?, Nick Roberts, 2006/10/18
- Re: Bug Database?, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?, Frank Schmitt, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Bug Database?, Nick Roberts, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?, Frank Schmitt, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?, Nick Roberts, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Nick Roberts, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Frank Schmitt, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Miles Bader, 2006/10/20
Re: Bug Database?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/20