[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def* |
|
Date: |
Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:03:28 -0400 |
So, is this a bug in `lisp-indent-line' (and the docstring of
`calculate-lisp-indent'), and '((8 241) 241) should be treated as
valid? Or, OTOH, it is a bug in `common-lisp-indent-function' and
friends?
Since the callers of `lisp-indent-line' fail when it returns such a
value, I conclude they agree with its documentation. So I conclude
that the bug is in `common-lisp-indent-function' and its subroutines.
- common-lisp-indent'ation of def*, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/10/23
- Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/26
- Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/10/26
- Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/26
- Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/10/27
- Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/27
- Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/10/27
- Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/28
- Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/10/28
- Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*, David Kastrup, 2006/10/28