[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode"
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode" |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:26:24 -0500 |
> What would people think of making font-lock-support-mode a no-op, and
> creating some new variable people can use if they really want to use
> something else instead of jit-lock?
They'd think "Damn, Richard! What got into you?".
Seriously, I think we're wasting our time here: this problem does not
impact functionality.
I am skeptical of these statements.
Could you present reasons for them?